WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 10-01-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.msnbc.com/news/857312.asp

      Powell: Jan. 27 not absolute deadline
      Secretary talks about Iraq, inspections and the 'smoking gun'
      By Tom Brokaw NBC NEWS

      Jan. 9 - In an interview with NBC's Tom Brokaw, Powell repeatedly referred to the importance of Saddam's cooperation under the terms of the U.N. Resolution 1441.

      Jan. 9 NBC's Tom Brokaw sat down with Secretary of State Colin Powell to ask about the importance of a "smoking gun" in the search for weapons in Iraq, and a possible timetable for military action. Powell repeatedly referred to the importance of Saddam Hussein's cooperation under the terms of U.N. Resolution 1441, which set the terms for the renewed U.N. weapons inspections.

      BROKAW: We now know that the United States is providing additional intelligence to the inspectors. Are you going to be able to provide the intelligence that could produce the smoking gun between now and January 27?

      Powell: We are doing everything we can to give Dr. [Hans] Blix, head of UNMOVIC, and Dr. [Mohamed] ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, all of the information that we can to allow them to do their work well. Whether or not it produces a "smoking gun" or not by the 27 of January, I can't answer. But the fact of the matter is that because he says so far there's no smoking gun does not mean there is not one there.

      Brokaw: But practically speaking, Mr. Secretary, remembering your old military hat, don't you have to have irreparable evidence, what people in the country are calling a photo of a smoking gun, of some kind, before you can go to war against Saddam Hussein and expect international cooperation?

      Powell: No. If the international community sees that Saddam Hussein is not cooperating in a way that would allow you to determine the truth of the matter, then he is in violation of the U.N. Resolution 1441. So, you don't really have to have a smoking gun.

      Brokaw: You told The Washington Post that January 27 is not an absolute deadline. Does that mean that if Hans Blix goes to the U.N. on January 27 and says, "Look, it's not a perfect process, but there is still room for us to do additional work there," that it will go on for what, another 30 days or so?

      Powell: The 27 of January is a date that these two gentlemen, Dr. Blix and Dr. ElBaradei, have been asked to report to the Council. That's all it is. It's a date that they are reporting to the council. So, it is an important day. But it is really a day for them to report, not a D-day.

      Brokaw: If the idea is to keep Saddam Hussein in a box, why not extend the inspections? He's got people poring all over his country, lots of Western press in there. He's not able to do anything. Why not extend it out two, three, four, five months?

      Powell: Well, I'm not saying that isn't going to happen. I don't know what will happen. We will see what Dr. Blix and Dr. ElBaradei report.

      Brokaw: In August of last year, Vice President Cheney said that Saddam Hussein was amassing weapons of mass destruction. He thought that the U.N. weapons inspection process would be futile. After the Iraqis filed their initial declaration on December 8 of this year, you said there was a material breach. Don't those meet all the criteria the president has set out to go to war against Iraq?

      Powell: Vice President Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and myself and the president have always expressed skepticism about the inspection process. That skepticism is still there.

      The United States is renewing all of its intelligence holdings. And we will have a presentation to make to the international community, probably through the Security Council, in due course, as to whether or not we believe Saddam Hussein is cooperating and what additional evidence we have that might not be immediately a product of the inspection process.

      Brokaw: Will that be an overwhelming case?

      Powell: We will see. Overwhelming is in the eyes of the receiver. We think there is a case that will be made, and it will be persuasive, in the absence of Iraqi cooperation


      World Fact Book (CIA)]
      Cross-Indexed:

      New document Icon Saddam's Science Adviser Surrenders


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)