WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 02-04-2017 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.torontosun.com/2017/04/01/new-star-of-fake-news

      New star of fake news
      By Michelle Malkin
      Saturday, April 01, 2017 08:10 PM EDT | Updated: Saturday, April 01, 2017 08:17 PM EDT

      He’s the new Al Sharpton on steroids - and he's coming to a TV near you.

      Benjamin Crump, camera-lovin' lawyer for the families of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, rocketed to fame perpetuating the “Hands up, don’t shoot” lie.

      Never mind that even the left-wing Obama Justice Department concluded the 22 witnesses who manufactured the Black Lives Matter-promoted narrative were unreliable, inconsistent, self-contradictory, unsupported by a shred of forensic evidence, or outright lying.

      In Crump World, anti-police ideology trumps facts. Social justice trumps actual justice. Big time. Crump is going Hollywood.

      Next week, the Florida-based legal celebrity will debut as one of six featured attorneys participating in show trials on the new Fox reality series, You the Jury.

      Crump is also serving as host and executive producer of a six-hour miniseries on the A&E Network titled Who Killed Tupac? And busy Benjamin is hosting Evidence of Innocence, a documentary series that will profile “the unbelievable true stories of individuals who were convicted of crimes they didn't commit.”

      The series will air on TV One, originally co-owned by Comcast and now controlled by Radio One (a minority-owned company that syndicates racial rabble-rouser, cop-basher and hate crime hoax godfather Al Sharpton).

      This is the same social justice TV network whose liberal anchor Roland Martin fed Democratic debate questions last year to disgraced former CNN contributor Donna Brazile, who finally admitted recently she leaked the information to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

      CNN president Jeff Zucker declared after an internal investigation that the network “would not partner ever again” with TV One.

      But not to worry. TV One was happy to partner with Sharpton's National Action Network to co-sponsor an awards show last fall that bestowed a special civil rights honor on Crump “for historic and transformative service.”

      “Transformative service”? Try manipulating reality for political gain.

      While the network has cast Crump as a champion of the falsely convicted, both are responsible for spreading falsehoods and inciting hatred against a former Oklahoma City police officer whose case is one of the worst miscarriages of justice I've ever encountered.

      Last fall, TV One's true-crime hit, Justice By Any Means, reenacted the story of former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzclaw with blowhard commentary from pundits who had no clue about the actual evidence in the case.

      “Legal analyst” Tanya Miller, for example, put words in Holtzclaw’s mouth that appear nowhere in the court record, trial transcripts, police reports or interviews.

      Holtzclaw was arrested, charged and convicted on numerous alleged sexual assaults in the summer of 2014, during the racially inflamed, anti-cop riots in Ferguson and Baltimore. A circus mob of militant BLM protesters gathered at the courthouse, chanting, “Give him life!” during proceedings and drowning out testimony as they demonstrated inside and outside on the streets. Agitators took photos of jurors in defiance of the steamrolled judge’s orders.

      Riot threats hung over jury deliberations.

      Crump now represents nine accusers (all black women from the gritty northeast OKC neighborhood Holtzclaw patrolled) who are plaintiffs in high-dollar state and federal civil rights lawsuits. Those clients include a convicted felon who preposterously described Holtzclaw as a “short, black man” when he's 6'1", half-Japanese, and pale, and a convicted felon who denied seven times she had been the victim of any inappropriate police conduct -until a sex-crimes detective informed her about the Holtzclaw investigation and she changed her story to claim that he had forced her to expose her breasts.

      Crump also represents the troubled young prostitute and drug user with a violent criminal record who called Holtzclaw a “hot cop” before accusing him of rape -months after Jannie Ligons' charges were publicized and Holtzclaw’s name and face widely disseminated.

      Crump falsely claimed on TV One that the crime lab found “DNA evidence inside” her “panties” and “vaginal DNA material on the inside of (Holtzclaw's) trousers” that “matched the DNA of the 17-year-old.”

      I’ve reached out to Crump to explain his egregious falsehoods and omissions. But the fake news rising star may be far too busy to bother with facts that undermine the lucrative social justice racket. Damn the truth. It’s showtime!

      Malkin is host of Michelle Malkin Investigates on CRTV.com. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com.
      Copyright © 2016 All rights reserved


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)