WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 15-06-2000 ]
Category
[ Information Technologies ]
sub-Categoy
[ AOL ]

      [http://www.techweb.com/

      AOL Again Shuts Off Instant-Messaging Rival
      (06/12/00, 4:40 p.m. ET) By Barbara Darrow, TechWeb News

      Just two weeks ago, Odigo touted its instant-messaging service as the first and only way to interoperate with both of America Online's instant messaging products, AOL Instant Messaging (AIM) and AOL's ICQ.

      Odigo may now wish it had kept a lower profile. Over the weekend, AOL (stock: AOL) blocked interoperability between Odigo Instant Messenger users and AIM users.

      "There was no communication from AOL," said a spokesman from Odigo, New York. "They did it over the weekend, like thieves in the night."

      It is not the first time AOL has erected walls between its AIM users and the rest of the instant-messaging universe. It already blocks interoperability between AIM and Microsoft (stock: MSFT) instant-messaging users. Odigo Messenger users can still access buddies using AOL's ICQ instant-messaging service, however.

      An AOL spokeswoman said the company was merely protecting the privacy of its members and assuring that they would not receive spam or other unwanted mail. "AOL is committed to the IETF process and want a technology standard to emerge but it won't happen overnight," she said.

      She was not sure why AOL blocked Odigo from AIM but did not do the same with ICQ.

      AOL's reluctance to play with third-party instant-messaging rivals apparently has caught the eye of federal regulators, however. Reuters reported Monday that the Federal Communications Commission has asked AOL whether it is working with other Internet companies on standards to allow customers using different instant messaging programs to interact and, if not, what benefits that provides to AOL customers.

      The FCC, which is reviewing AOL's bid to buy Time-Warner (stock: TWX), has requested more information on this and expects a reply by June 30. Some Internet players -- including CMGI (stock: CMGI), which owns a stake in several IM companies -- have petitioned the FCC to look into the matter.

      Cutting access to AIM users is a huge deal for Odigo, which was touting its product's links to both ICQ and AIM as a key differentiator.
      "What this means to our users is that, as of Saturday, they were prevented access to their buddies at AIM," said Avner Ronen, co-founder and vice president of Odigo.

      Since the company announced the new Messenger 2.5 10 days ago, it has added 100,000 users, he noted.

      "We're dedicated to providing interoperability," Ronen said. "We said we'd be interoperable with all the major IMs within the year, and we'll do our best. AOL is not returning our calls."

      AOL is by far the market leader in instant messaging, with an estimated 120 million users of its two offerings. (Odigo, by contrast, claims 1 million users.) That is the reason others seeking to break into the market are so eager to forge links with AOL's user base.

      Some in the messaging community were sympathetic to AOL's position.

      "Look, if companies would monetize, put a value on, what they get from intereoperating with AIM, AOL has shown an interest in interoperability," said David Hsieh, vice president of business development for FaceTime Communications, Foster City, Calif.

      Hsieh cited partnerships AOL has forged with his company as well as with Novell (stock: NOVL) and Lotus as examples of AOL's willingness to cooperate with other vendors.

      "AOL has spent time and money building value, and companies like Odigo are essentially hacking into their network," Hsieh said. "That would be like me building a phone and using AT&T's network without paying."

      Observers said the real opportunity of instant messaging, just as with telephony, lies in ubiquity and that eventually the vendors must assure interoperability between their various wares. This is especially true as instant messaging moves beyond the consumer realm into real-world customer-service applications, wherein companies will rely on instant-messaging connections to provide near real-time feedback on service and support issues.

      Ironically, Microsoft has been cast in the good-guy role by having its system interoperate with others. In instant messaging, AOL is Goliath, and Microsoft and the other players -- TribalVoice, Odigo, and FaceTime -- are Davids.

      "AOL is the 800-pound gorilla in this fight and will not let smaller players chip away at its monopoly," said Matt Cain, vice president of the Meta Group, a Stamford, Conn.-based researcher.

      The IM battle will likely follow the same route as calendar standards, he noted.

      "With the calendar there were many companies with different agendas, and they finally ended up in the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) forum and were able to drag the calendar specification out for years," Cain said. "At that point, the controversy moves behind closed doors. I expect this will drag out another two years." TW

      Related Stories:

      IM Industry Rails Against AOL's Iron Curtain
      Consumer Groups Fear AOL-Time Warner Merger
      IT, Vendors Ponder Instant Messaging]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)