WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 04-02-2004 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/leishman.html

      Harper solution to democratic deficit
      RORY LEISHMAN, London Free Press
      2004-02-02

      Prime Minister Paul Martin has promised to eliminate what he calls the "democratic deficit" in Ottawa. But what did he do last week? Like his predecessor, Jean Chretien, he went cap in hand to the Supreme Court of Canada, seeking permission for Parliament to enact a law on gay marriage.

      While Martin kowtows to the courts, United States President George W. Bush made clear in his state of the union message he will not tolerate any attempt by judicial activists to impose gay marriage on the American people. He called upon his fellow citizens to "take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization," and to remember: "The same moral tradition that defines marriage also teaches that each individual has dignity and value in God's sight."


      In 1996, the United States Congress reaffirmed the traditional legal definition of marriage in the Defense of Marriage Act. President Bill Clinton signed that act into law. So far, 37 states have adopted similar acts.


      In 1999, the Canadian House of Commons likewise resolved: "It is necessary, in light of public debate around recent court decisions, to state that marriage is and should remain the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others, and that Parliament will take all necessary steps within the jurisdiction of the Parliament of Canada to preserve this definition of marriage in Canada." The great majority of MPs, including Martin and Chretien, voted in favour of this resolution.


      Nonetheless, a three-judge panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal proceeded in a ruling last June to amend the law to include same-sex marriage.


      Former Ontario premier Ernie Eves acquiesced to this ruling. And so did Martin and Chretien.


      Meanwhile, in November, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court aped the Ontario Court of Appeal, by suddenly discovering a constitutional requirement for same-sex marriage. However, instead of capitulating to the court, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney immediately initiated an amendment to the state constitution reaffirming marriage as the voluntary union for life of a man and a woman.


      Bush has served notice he is contemplating a similar amendment to the constitution of the United States. In his state of the union address, he said: "Activist judges have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives.


      "On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard."


      Bush warned: "If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage."


      Who will stand up for the sanctity of marriage in Canada?


      Certainly not Martin and his Liberal cabinet. In announcing that the government has asked the Supreme Court of Canada for an opinion on the constitutionality of the traditional definition of marriage, Justice Minister Irwin Cotler stressed: "We are reaffirming our position in support of same-sex marriage. It's unwavering - no retreat."


      Among the contenders for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada, Belinda Stronach is also in favour of same-sex marriage. Tony Clement is opposed. Steven Harper maintains that parliamentarians should have the final say on upholding traditional marriage. Like Bush, Romney, and other leading politicians in the United States, Republican and Democratic, Harper insists elected legislators should refuse "to allow unelected, unaccountable judges to decide major social policies." Canadian voters should take note: If they want the judicially imposed democratic deficit eliminated in Canada, they should assure, first, that Harper wins the leadership of the Conservative party and then leads that party to victory in the upcoming federal election.


      Write Rory at The London Free Press, P.O. Box 2280, London, Ont. N6A 4G1 or fax 519-667-4528 or E-mail. Copyright © The London Free Press 2001,2002,2003


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)