WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 01-04-2020 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Britain ]

      [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/britain-coronavirus-wednesday-1.5517445

      Britain sees highest daily rise yet in coronavirus deaths
      Lancet editor, Labour Party criticize government with respect to testing numbers, confusion
      The Associated Press · Posted: Apr 01, 2020 11:53 AM ET

      When Prime Minister Boris Johnson developed a cough and fever, he got a test for the novel coronavirus. Most other Britons won't be offered one.

      Johnson's Conservative government was under fire Wednesday for failing to keep its promise to increase the amount of testing being done for COVID-19, even as the country saw its biggest rise yet in deaths among people with the virus, 563. Overall, 2,352 Britons have died in the pandemic.

      The issue has become an incipient political crisis for Johnson, who has mild symptoms and is working from isolation in the prime minister's Downing Street apartment.

      Richard Horton, editor of medical journal The Lancet, said Britain's handling of the COVID-19 crisis was "the most serious science policy failure in a generation."

      In a tweet, he noted that England's deputy chief medical officer said last week that "'there comes a point in a pandemic where that [testing] is not an appropriate intervention.'"

      Horton went on: "Now [testing is] a priority. Public message: utter confusion."

      Like some other countries, the U.K. has restricted testing to hospitalized patients, leaving people with milder symptoms unsure whether they have had the virus. Many scientists say wider testing - especially of health-care staff - would allow medics who are off work with symptoms to return if they are negative, and would give a better picture of how the virus spreads.

      Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick conceded Wednesday that "we do need to go further and we need to do that faster."

      The U.K. initially performed about 5,000 tests a day, but the government promised to increase that number to 10,000 by the end of last week and to 25,000 by mid-April. The target has not been met, with 8,630 tests carried out Monday, the last day for which figures are available.

      Lockdown occurred later than many countries
      Critics contrast the U.K. with Germany, which reacted quickly as reports of the respiratory virus emerged from China at the end of last year. It began producing a test for COVID-19 in January, almost a month before U.K. health authorities produced their own test. Germany now has the capacity to do 500,000 tests a week.

      Jenrick said the U.K.'s test tally should hit 15,000 a day "within a couple of days" and 25,000 a day in a couple of weeks. But progress has been agonizingly slow.

      The government says testing front-line health-care workers is a priority - however, only 2,000 have been tested so far, from a National Health Service workforce of more than one million.

      British officials blame shortages of swabs to take samples and of chemicals known as reagents, which are needed to perform the tests.

      "There is a massive demand for raw materials and commercial kits - this is not unique to the U.K. - and many places no longer have stock of essential reagents," said Stephen Baker, professor of molecular microbiology at the University of Cambridge.

      British officials defend their record at developing and deploying a test for COVID-19. They also say that while too little testing is a weakness, so is too much, because testing vast numbers of healthy people would be wasteful.

      That point was echoed by World Health Organization emergencies chief Dr. Mike Ryan, who said a ratio of 10 negative tests to one positive was "a general benchmark of a system that's doing enough testing to pick up all cases."

      In Britain, about 20 per cent of tests have been positive, suggesting a substantial number of cases are being missed.

      Critics of the British government say the testing debacle is typical of its sluggish and complacent response to the pandemic.

      The U.K. was slower than many European countries to implement measures such as closing schools, bars and restaurants and telling people to stay home to impede transmission of the virus. A nationwide lockdown was imposed just over a week ago.

      After a decade of public spending cuts by Conservative governments, the National Health Service and other public health bodies have very little spare capacity.

      Jonathan Ashworth, health spokesperson for the main opposition Labour Party, said health workers "are rightly asking if we've left it too late to buy the kits and chemicals we need, or whether our lab capacity is too overstretched after years of tight budgets."

      "NHS staff and carers on the front line who need these tests urgently deserve an immediate explanation from the government as to what's going on."

      Meanwhile, Prince Charles, who recently announced that he had tested positive for COVID-19, issued a video message as he emerged from a period of self-isolation. The 71-year-old heir to the British throne thanked health workers and said he is thinking of all the people who have been impacted by the outbreak.

      "At such an unprecedented and anxious time in all our lives, my wife and I are thinking particularly of all those who have lost their loved ones in such very difficult and abnormal circumstances, and of those having to endure sickness, isolation and loneliness," Charles said.

      ©2020 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved


      World Fact Book (CIA)]
      Cross-Indexed:

      New document Icon


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)