WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 26-03-2002 ]
Category
[ Philosophy ]
sub-Categoy
[ Religion ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/leishman.html

      There is a guide to moral truth
      By RORY LEISHMAN -- London Free Press
      March 26, 2002

      Many atheists are models of virtue. They do not lie, cheat or steal. They give generously to charity. They are faithful to their spouse. They deplore pederasty, bestiality and other sexual perversions.

      Yet with rare exceptions, they can't give any compelling reason for their admirable moral behaviour. What accounts for this paradox?


      Robert P. George, an eminent professor of philosophy at Princeton University, has explored this question in his latest book, The Clash of Orthodoxies. He observes the West is divided between exponents of the traditional Judeo-Christian worldview, which holds that morality is grounded in truth, and a new secularist orthodoxy which insists morality is a matter of arbitrary personal taste.


      David Hume, an 18th-century philosopher and atheist, gave classic expression to this latter notion. He said: "Reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions and may never pretend to any office other than to serve and obey them."


      On this basis, it follows all values are relative: You prefer your morals; I prefer mine. End of the discussion.


      Thomas Jefferson was not of this opinion. He upheld the Judeo-Christian viewpoint that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with an unalienable right to life and liberty.


      In contrast, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the revered American jurist and secular icon, upheld the secular orthodoxy.


      "All my life," he said, "I have sneered at the natural rights of man."


      The Judeo-Christian orthodoxy holds all human life is sacred. In Law Without Values: The Life, Work and Legacy of Justice Holmes, Albert Alschuler, a professor of law at the University of Chicago, recalls Holmes advocated the execution of unfit babies -- an idea that has been revived by Peter Singer, the animal rights activist and colleague of George in the philosophy department at Princeton.


      Granted, Singer is egregious. Most proponents of the secular orthodoxy do not countenance such abominations as infanticide and bestiality. Yet they insist there is no reason for objecting to these or any other immoral preferences.


      George and Alschuler are Christians: They maintain there is an objective difference between right and wrong that is attested by both reason and faith. But if their claim is true, why has the reason of secular intellectuals not led them to agree?


      Sir William Blackstone, Hume's great contemporary, explained this apparent anomaly. In his magisterial Commentary on the Laws of England, he held reason alone would be a sufficient guide to moral truth, "if our reason were always clear and perfect, unruffled by passions, unclouded by prejudice and unimpaired by disease or intemperance. But every man now finds the contrary in his own experience; that his reason is corrupt and his understanding full of ignorance and error."


      Does it follow there is no sure guide to moral truth? Not at all.


      Blackstone understood that, "In compassion to the frailty, the imperfection and the blindness of human reason, (divine providence) hath been pleased, at sundry times and in diverse manners, to discover and enforce its laws by an immediate and direct revelation. The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law and they are to be found only in the holy scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found upon comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man's felicity."


      Note Blackstone insisted there is no inherent conflict between reason and Christian faith. George and Alschuler concur. And so does their fellow philosopher, Pope John Paul II, who introduced his 1998 encyclical Fides et Ratio with the ringing affirmation: "Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth."


      Faith does not deny reason and reason does not contradict faith. Both faith and reason are essential to grasping the truth.


      "If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples and you will know the truth and the truth will make you free," said Jesus.


      These are words we can trust and believe.

      Write Rory at The London Free Press, P.O. Box 2280, London, Ont. N6A 4G1 or fax 519-667-4528 or E-mail.
      Letters to the editor should be sent to
      letters@lfpress.com.




      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)