WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 16-05-2004 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/Eric_Margolis/2004/05/16/461426.html

      Vietnam all over again
      In Iraq, the U.S. is repeating the errors of 50 years ago. Unfortunately, says Eric Margolis, the lessons of the past have been forgotten
      By Eric Margolis - Contributing Foreign Editor
      Sun, May 16, 2004

      FIFTY YEARS ago this month, France watched and wept for 57 days as its colonial troops defending the entrenched camp at Dien Bien Phu were submerged by endless waves of Vietnamese infantry.

      In an act of incredible folly, French generals air assaulted 15,700 soldiers into a broad valley in the remote mountains of North Vietnam in hopes of bringing the forces of Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap to decisive battle. Instead the French were cut off, pounded by enemy artillery and relentlessly ground down in ferocious, hand-to-hand combat by 50,000 Vietnamese soldiers.

      The fall of each strongpoint in the valley of death - Anne Marie, Dominique, Claudine, Hugette - was a dagger driven into the heart of France. Paris begged U.S. president Dwight Eisenhower to use nuclear weapons to stop the Vietminh, but he refused.

      LEGIONNAIRES OVERRUN
      On May 7, 1954, Foreign Legionnaires defending the last French strongpoint, Isabelle, were overrun. Nearly 10,000 French troops were killed or wounded, the rest taken captive. French soldiers were an army of lions, led by asses. France's rule over Indochina was broken and the first Vietnam war ended. Fourteen years later, U.S. Marines almost suffered a second Dien Bien Phu at the idiotic battle of Khe Sanh.

      Many Europeans retain vivid and negative memories of the continent's recent colonial past in Asia, Africa and the Mideast. They share a collective sense there is no profit or honour in messy colonial wars, and a desire to avoid foreign entanglements.

      In Vietnam, America learned many hard lessons about waging war in a nation where much of the population did not want them. Unfortunately these lessons have been forgotten - or were never learned - by the Bush administration, most of whose desk warriors evaded military service during Vietnam.

      So many grave errors made in Vietnam are now being repeated in Iraq.

      Here are some maxims of colonial warfare the U.S. will painfully relearn:

      FREEDOM
      - Most Arabs don't want to be "liberated," or what President George W. Bush calls "freedom." They want freedom from U.S. occupation, and freedom for Palestine.
      - People will accept misrule, robbery, abuse and torture by their fellow citizens - but not by foreigners.
      - The occupying power will always find locals ready to co-operate and join the colonial police and army for money. Ten percent will serve loyally; 50% will do nothing. The rest will covertly fight the occupiers, provide the resistance with intelligence or quietly sabotage the occupation.
      - Most of those who co-operate with the occupation will maintain secret links with the resistance. Massive defections will occur the minute the occupiers show the first signs of thinking about withdrawal.
      - Tribal, clan, ethnic and religious loyalties will also prove stronger than political ones imposed by the occupier. You cannot buy loyalty; you can only rent it.
      - An inevitable byproduct of colonial adventures is an unwanted, usually massive influx of people from the conquered country.
      - Colonial occupations almost always cost far more than planned and produce negative earnings for the invader. Occupying Iraq and Afghanistan now costs at least $6 billion US monthly. The costs of garrisoning and running colonies usually exceeds what can be looted from them.

      PLUNDERED OIL NOT ENOUGH
      - It's always cheaper to buy resources than plunder them. The Soviets thought they would pay for their invasion of Afghanistan by stealing its natural gas. The Washington neo-conservatives who engineered the Iraq war ludicrously claimed its stolen oil would fully cover the costs of invasion and occupation.
      - Guerrilla wars waged among civilians inevitably produce hatred for occupiers and corrupt the invaders. Torture, brutality, mass reprisals against civilians and black marketeering become epidemic, even among the best-disciplined troops. The longer occupation troops stay on, the more they become corrupted, brutalized and addicted to drugs - so do the nations that sent them.
      - Americans make poor colonialists. They lack the historical and cultural knowledge, subtlety, patience and Third World street smarts to be first-rate colonizers like the French or British. They lack the ruthlessness and brutality of Dutch, Japanese, Spanish or Russian colonialists. Or the ability to blend with the local population, as did the Portuguese.

      But Americans - and Canadians - make splendid liberators. France and Europe will still gratefully remember this fact long after the modern day empire builders now misdirecting U.S. foreign policy are forgotten.

      Eric can be reached by e-mail at: margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com Letters to the editor should be sent to: Editor@tor.sunpub.com Home Page


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)