WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 25-03-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Russia ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/03/24/50059-ap.html

      Russia denies sales to Iraq
      By JIM HEINTZ - Associated Press
      Mon, March 24, 2003

      MOSCOW (AP) - Russian officials hotly denied U.S. accusations that Moscow had broken U.N. sanctions by selling sensitive military equipment to Iraq, including anti-tank guided missiles, night-vision goggles and jamming devices.

      "We did not send any goods, including military ones, that violated the sanctions," Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov told reporters. "No fact supporting the Americans' anxiety has been found."

      This is not the first time Moscow has been accused of leaking sensitive technology to U.S. enemies in spite of pledges to tighten its export controls.
      The Washington Post reported Sunday that three Russian companies were involved in the sales. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Monday the equipment included night-vision goggles and global positioning system jammers.

      State Department officials said the equipment could pose a direct threat to coalition forces. Such sales would violate U.N. sanctions, which have let Iraq import only goods approved by the oil-for-food program.

      Ivanov said the United States had requested reports on the alleged illicit sales several times since October, with Russia making its most recent report on March 17. If there were any indication that Russian companies had shipped such goods, it would be investigated as a serious violation of Russian law, he added.

      Fleischer said at a White House briefing that he did not know whether Russia continues to help Iraq today, but he said U.S. officials have "asked the Russian government that any such ongoing assistance cease immediately."

      "The United States has credible evidence that Russian companies have provided assistance and prohibited hardware to the Iraqi regime," Fleischer said. "These actions are disturbing and we've made our concerns clear."

      Analysts here suggested the accusations were an attempt to discredit Russia after the Kremlin failed to support war against Iraq.

      "It seems to me it is just an attempt to put pressure on Russia and make the position of Russia in regard to Iraq softer," said Anton Khlopkov, an analyst at Moscow's PIR nonproliferation think tank.

      Andrei Kokoshin, a former head of the Russian Security Council, said he was "100 percent" sure that Russian companies had not sold prohibited equipment to Iraq, but said the goods could have been supplied by Russia to another country, which then resold them to Iraq.

      He suggested Ukraine, which the United States claims agreed to sell a sophisticated radar system to Iraq in violation of the sanctions.

      The Post identified two of the firms as KBP Tula and Aviaconversiya, a Moscow-based company, saying that KBP had supplied anti-tank guided missiles and Aviaconversiya provided the jamming devices
      .
      Aviaconversiya director Oleg Antonov denied the claim and called it "conjecture."

      "We have never delivered anything to Iraq," he said on Echo of Moscow radio.

      The deputy director of Tula's instrument design office, Leonid Roshal, also denied the report, according to the news agency ITAR-Tass.

      A spokesman for Russia's arms export agency, Rosoboronexport, said his organization "100 percent definitely had nothing to do with any sales and we have no information that such sales took place."

      Rosoboronexport is the sole state intermediary for Russian military exports and imports.

      A spokesman for the U.S. embassy in Moscow said on condition of anonymity that Moscow's response to the allegations "so far hasn't been satisfactory."

      "We hope that the responsible Russian agencies will take our concerns seriously," he said.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)