WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 09-06-2020 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Sweden ]

      [https://nationalpost.com/news/world/sweden-opposition-mps-say-immunity-strategy-has-failed-miserably-calls-for-scientist-behind-idea-to-resign

      Sweden opposition MPs say immunity strategy has 'failed miserably', calls for scientist behind idea to resign
      In a blistering opinion article, the leader of the populist Sweden Democrats said the state had failed to protect vulnerable citizens with its less restrictive lockdown
      The Telegraph
      Richard Orange
      June 9, 2020 8:49 AM EDT

      Sweden’s prime minister was criticised on Sunday over his handling of the coronavirus outbreak, with opposition MPs saying the country’s herd immunity strategy had “failed miserably” and demanding the resignation of the chief epidemiologist.

      In a blistering opinion article that analysts said marked the end of a political truce during the national crisis, the leader of the populist Sweden Democrats said the state had failed to protect vulnerable citizens with its less restrictive lockdown.

      Anders Tegnell should therefore resign,” wrote Jimmie Akkeson in the Dagens Nyheter newspaper, referring to the architect of the strategy. “Only then will he show the Swedish people that he takes responsibility for the mistakes [the Public Health Agency of Sweden] has made.”

      Ebba Busch-Thor, leader of the Christian Democrat party, also blamed Sweden’s strategy for some of the 4,694 deaths due to the virus. “What we can say about Sweden is that the greater part of those who are now mourning over those they have lost this spring are doing so because Sweden quite knowingly allowed a large spread of the infection,” she said in a heated debate broadcast on Sunday night.

      Ulf Kristersson, the leader of the Moderate Party, the biggest party on the centre-Right, held back from joining Mrs Busch-Thor’s attack on the strategy, instead criticising the implementation of it

      “I had no problem with the strategy. It was a bit slow but, when it was in place, I had nothing against it,” he said during the debate. “But the government didn’t put any power behind the words.”

      Nicholas Aylott, associate professor at Stockholm’s Sodertorn University, told The Daily Telegraph that the battery of attacks marked a turning point in the political climate around coronavirus. “This changes the tone of debate. No other party leader had previously criticised so squarely the government’s policy,” he said. “Up until relatively recently, there has been this period of borgfred [castle peace], as they call it – a political armistice around the government’s handling of coronavirus. They [the opposition parties] didn’t want to be hung out to dry as unreliable and semi-treacherous.”

      When asked, at a daily press conference, about the resignation call, Dr Tegnell dismissed it with a suppressed smile. “That’s a political discussion that I will leave to the politicians,” he said.

      In the debate, the country’s prime minister, Stefan Lofven, reiterated his support for Sweden’s decision not to impose a lockdown, instead laying the blame for the country’s high death rate on failures within elderly care.

      “I think the strategy is the right one,” he said. “But it has transpired that that very many people, in certain areas, have died in elderly care. There’s no doubt that elderly care needs to be improved.”

      However, the return of political opposition does not yet seem to reflect a loss of support for the government.

      A poll by Statistics Sweden, published yesterday, found that the ruling Social Democrats had the support of 33.7 per cent of voters in May, up 7.4 percentage points on the public statistics agency’s last poll, published in December.

      © 2020 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)