WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 28-12-2025 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [https://nationalpost.com/opinion/matthew-taub-eaton-centre-mob-wasnt-a-protest-it-was-a-warning

      Eaton Centre mob wasn’t a protest. It was a warning
      It is a domestic issue now. When movements that glorify violence seize public spaces, the social contract begins to fracture
      By Matthew Taub, Special to National Post
      Published Dec 27, 2025

      On Boxing Day, a pro-Palestinian mob took over the Eaton Centre, one of Canada’s busiest and most iconic public spaces, chanting for “intifada” in the heart of Toronto. Not on the fringes. Not quietly. In the middle of a mall filled with families, workers, tourists, and holiday shoppers.

      This did not happen in a vacuum. And it cannot be dismissed as just another protest.

      “Intifada” is not a vague political slogan. Many authorities, Jewish and otherwise, say it is a clear call for violent uprising. London’s Metropolitan Police arrested two people who called for intifada this month.

      Historically, it has meant suicide bombings, stabbings, shootings, and the deliberate targeting of Jewish civilians. To chant it openly in Canada, just weeks after the mass murder of Jews at Bondi Beach, is not political expression.

      It is intimidation. It is incitement. And it is a warning sign.

      We need to stop pretending otherwise.

      For more than two years, Canadian Jews have been told to politely “separate criticism of Israel from antisemitism.” That fiction ends when mobs openly chant for violent uprising in public spaces and Jews are instructed to remain calm, stay silent, and place their safety in the hands of institutions that have already failed them.

      This is not about free speech. Free speech does not include calls for violence. It does not include glorifying mass murder. If a crowd took over a major Canadian mall chanting for violence against any other group, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, or LGBTQ Canadians, the response would be swift and unequivocal. Police intervention. Political condemnation. Media clarity.

      But when Jews are the target, the reaction is hesitation, euphemism, and moral fog.

      We are told it is complicated.

      It is not.

      This movement is not merely attempting to influence opinion about Israel. It is deliberately working to turn public sentiment against Jewish Canadians by association, casting Jews as foreign, illegitimate, colonial, or dangerous.

      Once that narrative takes hold, the target does not stop with Jews.

      History makes this painfully clear. Jews are never the final target. We are the first.

      Today it is “Zionists.” Tomorrow, it will be Christians who refuse to renounce Israel. Then Hindus. Then, anyone who stands in the way of an ideological worldview that divides society into oppressors and enemies. The slogans themselves say this openly. “Globalize the intifada.” “By any means necessary.” “Resistance is justified.”

      They are not hiding their intentions. We are choosing not to listen.

      The Eaton Centre takeover matters not simply because it was disruptive, but because it crossed a critical line. The normalization of intimidation in shared public spaces. When mobs feel comfortable chanting for violent uprising in one of Canada’s most visible locations, with little consequence, it sends a message that this behaviour is tolerated.

      It is heard by Jewish parents deciding whether it is safe for their children to wear a Star of David. By seniors who remember what it feels like when hatred stops being abstract. By students who now hesitate before identifying themselves on campus. And yes, it will eventually be heard by others who assume this has nothing to do with them.

      Canada prides itself on pluralism, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence. But pluralism does not mean allowing one group to terrorize another in the name of activism. Tolerance does not mean tolerating calls for violence. And coexistence collapses when intimidation becomes normalized.

      Calling this out is not anti-Palestinian. It is pro-Canadian. It is about defending a basic civic principle. Political disagreement does not grant permission to threaten your neighbours. You are welcome in Canada to advocate for the Palestinians. You are not welcome to call for attacks on Israelis and Jews.

      Law enforcement must enforce existing laws against incitement and public intimidation consistently and without political hesitation. Media outlets must stop laundering extremist language through euphemisms that sanitize its meaning.

      Most importantly, Canadians must understand that this is no longer a distant foreign conflict playing out symbolically here. It is a domestic issue now. When movements that glorify violence seize public spaces, the social contract begins to fracture.

      We have seen this road before. We know how it starts.

      The only question is whether we are willing to stop pretending we do not.

      Because this was not just a protest.

      It was a warning.

      Matthew Taub is the founder of Unapologetically Jewish.

      © 2025 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited


      World Fact Book (CIA)]]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)