WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 23-02-2002 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/EdmontonNews/es.es-02-22-0004.html
       
      Give me life!
      Man who plotted to kill mom wants judge to throw away the key
      By TONY BLAIS, Edmonton Sun
      Friday, February 22, 2002

      In a bizarre twist straight out of a Hollywood movie, a city man yesterday asked to be sentenced to life in prison for hiring a hit man to kill his adopted mother, a well-known Alberta environmentalist.

      Court heard the unusual request - which is much stiffer than the 15-year prison term sought by the Crown - was to stop the man from getting out and trying to kill her again.


      Daniel Thomas Kostuch, 27, made his odd petition to Queen's Bench Justice Frans Slatter through his lawyer, after pleading guilty to counselling the offence of murder.


      Defence lawyer Mona Duckett reluctantly relayed Kostuch's instructions, saying his intent is "to protect his mother," which she called an "interesting contradiction."


      Duckett, who told the court a proper sentence would be one in the high single digits, said Kostuch is fearful of the anger inside him and doesn't currently trust himself to be in the community without first getting treatment.


      Kostuch also pleaded his own case with the judge.


      "I realize what I did was wrong," he said. "I can't express to you or tell you how I feel still to this day, which is not much different than I did 10-and-a-half months ago.


      "That's why I asked for a life sentence," he continued. "I figure if I do have a life sentence, I'll be forced to take treatment and do the programming they want ... I don't want to get out. I'm tired of feeling the way I feel ... all this junk and garbage inside of me. It's what I asked for and it's what I think I need to help myself."


      Slatter is to sentence Kostuch today.


      Reading from an agreed statement of facts, Crown prosecutor Susan Hughson said in early March 2001, Kostuch asked a friend he had met while on parole whether he would kill his adopted mother, Martha Kostuch, for $25,000.


      The money was to come from an inheritance from the estate of Martha Kostuch, a Rocky Mountain House veterinarian who is a vocal environmentalist, court heard.


      Hughson said Daniel Kostuch's friend contacted police who set up an undercover operation April 4. Court heard Kostuch offered an undercover RCMP officer $40,000 to murder his mother and suggested using an injured animal ploy to get to her.


      Kostuch told the cop he had been planning the murder for 13 years because of a "hatred" that had built up, and he expected to inherit $200,000 from his mother's estate which he said he would use to fulfil his dream of owning a bar.


      Kostuch also offered $10,000 for any additional people he might have to kill during the hit, court heard.


      Hughson said it was a "despicable offence" and Kostuch showed a "chilling determination" to carry out the plot, which she characterized as "almost an ultimate betrayal of the woman who adopted him."


      Hughson also cited a letter Kostuch wrote to his mother last month in which he says he is not sure if he would ever try to have her or anyone else killed and that he is always thinking of ways to have people killed.


      The letter begins with "Dear Mom" and ends: "I am so scared that I'll never ever be able to be normal again."


      In a statement, Martha Kostuch said she worries her son might try to do it again - but she still "very much" loves him.



      World Fact Book (CIA)]]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)