WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 17-06-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ European Union ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/06/16/112608-ap.html

      EU will back war over weapons of mass destruction only when diplomacy fails
      By BY ROBERT WIELAARD
      Mon, June 16, 2003

      LUXEMBOURG (AP) - The European Union said Monday it could accept going to war to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction but only after exhausting all diplomatic means.

      At a meeting, the EU foreign ministers issued a strategy paper in response to the significant differences in the run-up to the Iraq war between Washington and European capitals over how to deal with weapons of mass destruction.

      Ideally, according to the strategy paper, war would need the approval of the United Nations Security Council. But the EU foreign ministers left open the question of whether approval was mandatory, saying the council "should play a central role."

      Cristina Gallach, spokeswoman for EU foreign policy and security chief Javier Solana, said the reference to the role of the UN had been left intentionally ambiguous in order to satisfy all sides in the debate.

      The paper says that, when diplomacy has failed, "coercive measures under Chapter VII of the UN Charter and international law - sanctions, selective or global, interceptions of shipments and, as appropriate, the use of force - could be envisioned."

      It suggested a multilateral approach to containing the spread of weapons of mass destruction through such steps as strengthening export controls, ensuring compliance with non-proliferation commitments and promoting close co-ordination with the United States.

      "We will not go immediately to military action," Solana told reporters. "Many things have to be done before we go to the United Nations to see if measures are taken."

      Although adopted by all 15 EU countries, it is not legally binding, leaving open the possibility of a repeat of the sort of transatlantic friction that preceded the Iraq war.

      Britain and Spain - and, to a lesser extent, Denmark, Italy, Portugal and the Netherlands - sided with Washington over the Iraq war, whereas German and France led an antiwar camp in Europe.

      The United States and Britain cited the alleged presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify the war. No such weapons have been found yet. Most EU governments insisted diplomacy and arms inspections in Iraq be given more time.

      "The EU is committed to the multilateral system," the strategy paper says, adding that the European Union will seek to bolster compliance with international treaties banning the production and use of weapons of mass destruction.

      For these treaties to be credible they must be made more effective, the paper adds.

      "This means working with those who share our interest in preventing proliferation. And it also means dealing with those who cheat," it said.

      The paper - along with an action plan to give the fight against weapons of mass destruction greater priority in the EU's dealings with other countries - was approved on a day when the foreign ministers also debated Iran and allegations Tehran uses its nuclear energy program to make atomic weapons.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)