WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 06-08-2005 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/1962096

      Court dismisses McCorvey's request to reopen Roe v. Wade
      June 21, 2003, 12:31AM
      Associated Press

      DALLAS - A federal district court has dismissed a request by the former plaintiff known as "Jane Roe" to reconsider the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion 30 years ago.

      Norma McCorvey, who joined the anti-abortion fight 10 years ago, filed the "motion for relief from judgment" Tuesday, asking the court to reopen Roe v. Wade and conduct a wide-ranging inquiry into scientific and anecdotal evidence she says shows abortion hurts women.

      The court dismissed McCorvey's request late Thursday, saying it wasn't made within a "reasonable time" after the 1973 judgment.

      "Whether or not the Supreme Court was infallible, its Roe decision was certainly final in this litigation," Judge David Godbey wrote in the ruling. "It is simply too late now, 30 years after the fact, for McCorvey to revisit that judgment."

      McCorvey's attorney, Allan Parker, said his client will likely ask the court to reconsider its ruling.

      "I think the judge has misunderstood the case," Parker said. "This is not a case of newly discovered evidence, which must be brought in a short amount of time. It's a case of changed factual conditions and law."

      The changed law, Parker said, is the so-called "Baby Moses" act, which Texas pioneered in 1999, that allows the state to assume responsibility for unwanted children. Parker said the burden on women raising unwanted children was one of the determining factors in the Supreme Court's decision to legalize abortion, but since that factor no longer exists in as many as 40 "Baby Moses" states, Roe v. Wade should be reconsidered.

      Sarah Weddington, the abortion rights activist and attorney who originally represented McCorvey, said she was delighted, but not surprised McCorvey's request was dismissed.

      "It never should have been filed," Weddington said Friday morning. "Those who filed it got publicity but the publicity actually has been very helpful for those of us who believe the government should not be involved."

      McCorvey and her attorneys asked the federal court to consider more than 5,400 pages of evidence, including 1,000 affidavits from women who regret their abortions, in re-evaluating the Supreme Court's decision.

      The Supreme Court decision came after McCorvey had the baby. It was the third child McCorvey put up for adoption; she was a 21-year-old carnival worker at the time.

      McCorvey publicly identified herself as Jane Roe in 1980. She later embraced Christianity and shocked the abortion rights community in 1995 by joining the group Operation Rescue.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)