WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 12-03-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/nation/1814345

      Prisoners held at Guantanamo have no U.S. rights, court rules
      By SAM HANANEL
      Associated Press

      March 11, 2003, 8:28PM

      WASHINGTON - The 650 suspected Taliban and al-Qaida fighters held at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba have no right to hearings in U.S. courts, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

      The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the detainees are aliens held outside U.S. territory and therefore are not entitled to rights granted by the U.S. Constitution, such as having access to a lawyer and not being held indefinitely without charges being filed against them.

      "If the Constitution does not entitle the detainees to due process, and it does not, they cannot invoke the jurisdiction of our courts to test the constitutionality or the legality of restraints on their liberty," the three-judge panel wrote, upholding a lower-court decision.

      The unanimous decision represents a victory for the Bush administration, which plans to hold the men indefinitely while authorities interrogate them and determine whether they should be sent back to their homelands or face military tribunals.

      Attorney General John Ashcroft said the decision recognized the Supreme Court's principle that "this nation's enemies may not enlist America's courts to `divert efforts and attention from the military offensive abroad to the legal defensive at home.' "

      "In times of war, the president must be able to protect our nation from enemies who seek to harm innocent Americans," Ashcroft said.

      The case was brought by the families of 16 detainees from Australia, Britain and Kuwait. They claim the government is unfairly holding the men - some for more than a year - without charge, leaving them in a state of legal limbo.

      "You can't just drop people into a black hole and forget about them," said Joe Margulies, an attorney who argued the case on behalf of the British and Australian prisoners. "There has to be a right to test the lawfulness of their detention."

      Amnesty International spokesman Alistair Hodgett also criticized the decision.

      "To hold people without charge and without access to legal counsel risks the creation of an American gulag for those detained in the course of the war on terror," he said.

      In its ruling, the appeals court relied on a half-century-old Supreme Court ruling that said German prisoners detained by the United States in China had no right to access to federal courts.

      The Guantanamo base is a 45-square-mile area on the southeastern tip of Cuba. The land was seized by the United States in the Spanish-American War and has been leased from Cuba for the past century.

      None of the roughly 650 prisoners from 40 countries has been allowed to see their families, but a handful of Afghan and Pakistani detainees have been sent home after being cleared by U.S. authorities.


        World Fact Book  (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)