WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 23-06-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/06/23/118098-ap.html

      Educators hail, opponents decry Supreme Court decision on affirmative action
      By STEVE GIEGERICH
      Mon, June 23, 2003

      WASHINGTON (AP) - It will be business as usual, almost. The country's college administrators called Monday's split Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action a victory that will allow them to keep admissions policies largely intact.

      "The decisions uphold the principle that colleges have the right to not only use their own discretion, but that there is a compelling interest to making sure diversity is there," said Cheryl Fields, a spokeswoman for the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, which represents 211 schools. "Based on that, I think most universities will not have to make sweeping changes in what they're doing," she said.

      Along with other higher education experts, Fields embraced the court's 5-4 decision to uphold the University of Michigan's law school admission policy that sought a "critical mass" of minorities. The experts discounted the court's companion ruling which, by a 6-3 vote, struck down Michigan's undergraduate admissions formula of awarding points to minorities based on race.

      "The Michigan undergraduate program is relatively unique and is not replicated by a significant number of schools," said Sheldon Steinbach, the general counsel for the American Council on Education, an umbrella group representing many U.S. universities.

      A leading opponent of affirmative action policies warned that the court's "great disservice" in the Michigan rulings extends the debate over racial balancing that began 25 years ago, when the court said race was one of several factors that can be considered in determining college admissions.

      Ward Connerly, who helped win voter approval of an anti-affirmative initiative affecting California schools, vowed to present his case to voters across the country. "We have to seriously contest all this at the ballot box as we did in California,"

      Connerly said. "It may be time for us to pay a visit to the state of Michigan and let the voters decide if they want to use race as a factor in admissions. The court said they may use race. They didn't say they have to use race."

      But the mood among officials at Michigan was upbeat. "This is a resounding affirmation that will be heard across the land, from our college classrooms to our corporate boardrooms," Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman said in a statement.

      Rebecca Chopp, the president of Colgate University in Hamilton, N.Y., said the law school ruling leaves the status quo in place at her school and most other small, liberal arts colleges.

      "We look at each student very uniquely and evaluate them qualitatively. So, certainly, race is important," Chopp said. "But what part of the country that they come from and whether they're a cello player or a lacrosse player is important, too."

      In Florida, the state has dropped affirmative action programs in favour of so-called percentage plans, which guarantee that top-tier students from each high school will be admitted to public universities, regardless of race.

      Democratic state legislators said in the aftermath of Monday's ruling that programs which include race should be revived, but Republican Gov. Jeb Bush said the policy wouldn't change. Texas also uses a percentage plan. That program will stay in place, but University of Texas president Larry Faulkner said the school also would start work on a new admissions policy that takes race into account.

      Like Connerly, few in higher education believe the court's ruling will be the last word on affirmative action. "In a country that graduates 44,000 lawyers per year and is a litigious society, everything is subject to challenge," Steinbach said.

      The senior faculty adviser for the National Black Student Union praised the court, however, for providing a "firm foundation" for future challenges to affirmative action.

      Said Roger Pulliam, assistant vice-chancellor for academic support services at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater: "Given the political climate, we could have lost everything."


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)