WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 17-01-2021 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-christian-nationalism-experiment-failed

      The Christian nationalism experiment failed
      by Kimberly Ross January 14, 2021 11:00 PM

      The United States is not a Christian nation. Still, we reside in a country that pledges to be "one nation under God" and holds "In God We Trust" as its motto. At best, these are hopeful suggestions and remnants of some small parts of our past. But they do not represent who we are, especially at present.

      Because of this reality, many in the faith community have looked for an audacious political leader to battle secularism for quite some time. After decades of playing relatively nice, they decided on a new approach.

      In 2016, Donald Trump became "the chosen one," and an era of high-profile Christian nationalism began. Only this time, the strength of passion behind the movement hit growing progressivism head-on.

      This toxic mix has only grown worse as many in the Republican Party became obsessively convinced of the president's divinely inspired "rightness," no matter the words, issues, or actions.

      He was placed in a position of power to save our nation and change the course of history. One could argue he accomplished the latter. The former, not so much.

      Early on, it became clear that the Republican Party under Trump would be unseemlily devoted to the man through thick and thin. After all, he was placed in the White House "for such a time as this."

      Criticism was not allowed. Engaging in any condemnation meant a tacit endorsement of the Left and, by extension, godless socialism. Trump represented the party of freedom of speech and religion, the right to bear arms, small government, right to life, and pride in the country. No matter the issue, opposing him was proof the combatant didn't care much about stopping evil or defending the good. Worst of all, it was proof that they didn't care about our nation and its transformation.

      At the end of the Trump presidency, a larger audience sees what critics saw all along: Christian nationalism is not a healthy extension of belief, and Trump is the last person who should have been tapped to lead the reformational charge.

      Still, a noxious political atmosphere didn't happen overnight. In this case, it has been brewing for quite some time, long before Trump emerged on the scene. Trump is the Republican Party's immediate answer to the eight years of former President Barack Obama.

      While the Left viewed Trump as the problem, the Right primarily saw him as an antidote to a problem. Beyond the purely political motivations sat something even more powerful. Christians in the U.S. embraced him as an unapologetic fighter and defender of their beliefs. It didn't matter if Trump was not devout because God would use him to turn the country back to Christianity and right many wrongs. It is a significant problem with Christian nationalism.

      It seeks to sway society through legislative means as if the law is what influences hearts. By investing so much in one seemingly anointed man, the Christian community lost sight of the goal early on and idolized the vessel to its collective detriment.

      The corruption of the Republican Party will last well into the future, so, too, will this corruption of faith.

      During the last four years, Christianity and Trumpism have become intrinsically linked. Undoing it will take a lot of effort. On Jan. 6, the mob descended upon the Capitol, and dispersed among the crowd were crosses, signs, and banners with "Jesus Saves" or "Jesus 2020."

      Days later, the faculty and staff of Wheaton College, an evangelical institution, issued a statement, saying, "The January 6 attack on the Capitol was characterized not only by vicious lies, deplorable violence, white supremacy, white nationalism, and wicked leadership - especially by President Trump - but also by idolatrous and blasphemous abuses of Christian symbols." The mob mentality at the Capitol wasn't just in the name of the Republican Party. It was supposedly a holy stand against the wrong - in this case, President-elect Joe Biden, who is set to be sworn into office on Jan. 20.
      The response wasn't just in reaction to the Nov. 3 election results.

      During the pandemic, people saw houses of worship unfairly targeted despite secular businesses being allowed to remain open. Government officials used a global health crisis to suppress faith communities, and the new year would usher in a new, unsympathetic administration. Christians and Republicans could not stand by and watch as their only hope for protection was kicked out of the White House.

      But none of this began with Trump. He was simply the tool that many in the Christian community had been waiting to arrive. As long as he delivered results, the churchgoing base would look past the deep flaws in his character. Christian nationalism aims to turn the country back to God through the avenues of patriotism and politics. It's a faulty premise from the start because the focus relies far too much on those who crave power first and foremost. This mindset gave Trump a blank check in which he could behave in any manner he chose with little to no repercussions.

      The U.S. is a diverse nation. We do not reside in a theocracy. Regrettably, the attempts to place all hope in one man for the sake of a holy mission have failed across the board.

      When nothing else matters except "owning the Libs," the substance of belief is pushed away for temporary victories. Such nonchalance has not only harmed a party that lost the White House, Senate, and House, but it's harmed American Christendom, too.

      Copyright 2021. Washington Examiner. All Rights Reserved.

       
      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)