WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 13-06-2023 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65863399

      The different ways Republicans defend Trump over indictment are revealing
      Most Republicans have reacted to Donald Trump's latest indictment by defending the former president and denouncing the prosecution. But dig a little deeper, and the language they use to defend him is revealing.
      By Katty Kay US Special Correspondent
      13/06/2023

      It is sometimes said of America's stark political divisions that the US is two countries sharing the same landmass. The same could be said of the Republican party - it's several parties sharing the same political brand.

      Donald Trump's indictment under the Espionage Act has made those divisions within the party particularly stark.

      Here's a quick look at how the various factions are talking about the classified documents charges - and what's motivating their responses.

      The Trump rivals
      This is the group most under scrutiny, and the group with the most to lose - the Republicans running against Mr Trump for the party's presidential nomination in 2024.

      These are the people who want to distinguish themselves from Mr Trump, while not alienating his supporters.

      They seem to get round the dilemma by focusing their defence on the suggestion that the law isn't being fairly applied since Joe Biden, when he was vice-president, also took classified documents as he left office. The current president is still being investigated, but a key difference is that he returned the files.

      The reaction of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Mr Trump's closest current rival, typifies this approach. He appeared to defend Trump when he claimed that there has been an "uneven application of the law." Another presidential hopeful, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, said that the charges in the indictment were an example of "a justice system where the scales are weighted".

      Former Vice-President Mike Pence, who is now running against his old boss, told a weekend Republican convention that no one was above the law. Then he talked about years of alleged politicisation at the Department of Justice and the failure to prosecute Hillary Clinton.

      The situation is fluid, however, and each of the 2024 hopefuls will be regularly re-calculating their strategies as events unfold.

      Take former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, for example. She initially released a statement that sounded very similar to her fellow presidential candidates. "This is not how justice should be pursued in our country," she tweeted.

      By Monday afternoon, during a Fox News appearance, she changed her tune, critiquing the former president far more directly.

      Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie wants to force Republicans into a reckoning with Trump. At a CNN town hall, he urged his fellow 2024 rivals to stop blaming the Department of Justice and blame Trump. "Whether you like Donald Trump or you don't... this conduct is inexcusable for someone who wants to be president." Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas governor, has called for Trump to drop out of the 2024 race.

      And yet it may be the longshot candidate, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, who is more in touch with the party's base: he doubled down on his defence, saying he'd pardon Trump if elected.

      True Trumpers
      That will go down well with the loudest and biggest of the Republican factions, the group who stand by the former president no matter what charges are levelled against him. Indeed, the more charges Trump faces, the more they point to a concerted, coordinated effort to discredit him.

      They say the documents charges are an attempt by President Biden to get rid of a political opponent in an election season. Early polling suggests this indictment has not persuaded any of the True Trumpers to drop their support for him.

      "It is unconscionable for a President to indict the leading candidate opposing him," House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said. The top Republican in Congress knows it's an independent special counsel who brought the charges against Mr Trump, but he needs to keep this hard right conservative faction, led by Jim Jordan, on-side.

      These Trump supporters do not want to even engage in the details of the legal case against him.

      The never (and no longer) Trumpers
      Trump lost these Republicans long ago - they do sometimes still side with him in rare moments when they swallow their disapproval because they like his policies: this is not one of those moments.

      Bill Barr, Trump's former Attorney General, told Fox News this weekend that he was was shocked by the degree of sensitivity of the documents and how many there were. "If even half of it is true, then he's toast," he said. "And this idea of presenting Trump as a victim here, a victim of a witch hunt, is ridiculous."

      Republican Senator Mitt Romney said the charges, if proven, were consistent with other times the former president had worked against the national interest. "Mr Trump brought these charges upon himself by not only taking classified documents, but by refusing to simply return them when given numerous opportunities to do so.

      But don't expect to hear many of them speak out against the former president, especially not those still holding political office. It's a pretty lonely group.

      © 2023 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites

      _Trump-Inditement_Gov.US-Courts.dcd.258149.1.0_1.pdf


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)