WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 14-04-2004 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Edmonton/Paul_Stanway/2004/04/14/419942.html

      America did not lay down the law in Iraq
      By PAUL STANWAY -- For the Edmonton Sun
      Wed, April 14, 2004

      When even U.S. President George Bush admits American troops have been having "a tough week" in Iraq, it's hardly surprising to see the armchair generals in the media dusting off all their old Vietnam analogies.

      Not that they need much dusting. Lately, hardly a day goes by without some pundit suggesting that here is more proof the U.S. is becoming mired in a major conflict it can't win and doesn't know how to end.


      Well, Iraq is not yet Vietnam, but there is troubling evidence that America might be in danger of losing its way in this latest conflict.


      This week's fighting in several Iraqi cities provides graphic evidence of the problems to be faced in a region where the question of leadership has traditionally been settled by violence and sustained by more violence.


      The invasion of Iraq was, in most respects, a textbook operation, and it was clear from the beginning that the U.S. was trying to avoid Iraqi casualties in the belief that this would make it easier for the majority of Iraqis to eventually welcome liberation from Saddam Hussein and co-operate with the Americans in rehabilitating their country


      For the same reason, U.S. forces stood by while looters took to the streets and carried off everything that wasn't nailed down - and most things that were.


      But in doing so the Americans failed in the No. 1 priority for any occupying power: the imposition of law and order.


      It's impossible to know what the summary execution of a few looters might have achieved, beyond predictable media outrage, but it's fair to say that the vacuum created by this unwillingness to impose order has encouraged opposition to the occupation and led directly to the current violence.

      It may seem paradoxical to the western mind, but the reluctance of the U.S. military to use exemplary force to discourage lawlessness and curb violent opponents is likely to have been interpreted by many in Iraq as a sign of weakness, not magnanimity.


      It is worth remembering that it is a core belief of Islamic militants that the U.S. is morally weak and dissolute, doesn't have the stomach to either take or inflict casualties in any great number, and will inevitably give up if things get too hot.


      Osama bin Laden likes to point to former American president
      Ronald Reagan's withdrawal of U.S. marines from Lebanon, and the hasty exit of American troops from Somalia under Bill Clinton, as proof of the superpower's vulnerability.

      These views are repeated endlessly by the militant clerics who are driving opposition to the U.S. occupation of Iraq.


      And, so far, it is difficult to argue that the Americans have done enough to convince the majority of Iraqis that it is they, not the militant imams, who can guarantee law and order, let alone the lofty goals of democracy and prosperity.


      The fighting in Iraq in recent days does not seem to be the beginning of a general uprising by the Iraqi people. The various militant groups are not large (the Shiite Mahdi militia, for example, is thought to number no more than 5,000), but their leaders understand that violence can magnify influence.

      In the past few days they have served notice that they are a force to be reckoned with and will continue to be so when the Americans are gone.


      The Bush administration's response has been to continue to hope for the best.


      When asked about this week's fighting in Fallujah, Dan Senor, a military spokesman, confirmed "our goal is to minimize bloodshed and head off any sort of conflict." But does the one necessarily lead to the other?


      "This violence we've seen is part of a few people trying to stop progress toward democracy," President Bush said on the weekend.


      And he's right.


      But unfortunately those few are gaining in influence as a result of the violence, and progress in Iraq will become more difficult as a result.


      Letters to the editor should be sent to mailbag@edm.sunpub.com Home Page


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)