WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 05-04-2005 ]
Category
[ Science ]
sub-Categoy
[ Psychology ]

      [http://www.princeton.edu/~freshman/science/crick/ast.html

      Francis Crick's Astonishing Hypothesis
      "If a term has to be used for the whole set of ideas I would suggest Neural Edelmanism." - Francis Crick (referring to Edelman's theory, Neural Darwinism)

      Crick, though sharing many of the same reductionist views of neural functioning as does Edelman, ironically holds Edelman's theory in some degree of contempt.

      In his book, The Astonishing Hypothesis, Crick examines the understanding of consciousness. Just as Edelman, he claims that comprehension of the behavior of humans hinges on the understanding of the behavior of neurons, both individually and in groups.

      Crick claims that the best way to begin our exploration of consciousness is first to understand how we interpret visual information. This process is, in itself, fairly complicated, however, and will demand much research before knowledge of the matter will in any way be definitive.

      First, to understand consciousness (either visual or general), we must determine where the cells responsible for determining consciousness are located. While the idea that consciouness may be clustered within either one or multiple areas of the brain may seem preposterous, this conjecture is certainly much more efficient than each cell carrying within itself the instructions for consciousness.

      Once we have determined the location of those cells dictating consciousness, we can then determine how the decisions on what objects (or thoughts) we are aware of at any point and which are relegated to the subconscious. It seems almost impossible, though, to know either one without first understanding the other.

      Deeper than knowing how we determine of which object we are conscious at any period of time is understanding how we can determine what the object to which we are attending actually is. Clearly, one cell can not be responsible for recognizing one object; there are far more objects possible in the world than there are cells in the human brain.

      Therefore, the cells must work in combination to recognize objects; the possible combinations of cells in your brain are nearly infinite and certainly sufficient for perceiving any object that one could ever encounter. The question is what cells are working together to identify an object and how do they know they are working together, a dilemma known as the binding problem.

      Mike Akins '99.
      May 25, 1996.]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)